Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:10

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Is a housing crisis looming in China?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How do great movie moments influence how people handle real-life moral dilemmas?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why Elon Musk's satellites are 'dropping like flies' - Yahoo
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
LIVE: Reaction as Russell wins but Piastri and Norris collide in Canada - racingnews365.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Checkers Drop Game 1 of Finals in Double Overtime - Charlotte Checkers Hockey
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
England is launching a gonorrhea vaccine. Is Canada next? - Yahoo
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
US Steel Sale to Nippon Steel Poised To Close After Trump Deal - Bloomberg.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?